( 1 ) THE executability of the decree obtained by the petitioner for recovery of the arrears of maktha due from the tenants by way of sale of the properties charged therefor, calls for decision in this revision petition, the execution coutt having held that the remedy of the petitioner is to obtain a final decree and bring the charged properties for sale thereafter. In support of the conclusion of the lower court, it relied upon the decision in Tiruvengalam vs. Ammanna. Sri Ramasarma, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that in the case relied upon by the lower court there was a pre-existing statutory charge under Sec. 55 of the Transfer of Property Act, whereas in the instant case the charge was created by the court for the first time without reference to any pre-existing statutory charge. In my opinion the question raised is of considerable importance requiring decision by a Division Bench of this court. Place the papers before the Hon ble Chief Justice for appropriate orders. Pursuant to the above order of reference these petitions came on for hearing before the Division Bench and the Court delivered the following.

( 2 ) THESE two C. R. Ps. have come up by way of ref

Click Here to Read the rest of this document