SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 384

S.S.M.QUADRI
JAYAVARAPU VENKATESWARLU – Appellant
Versus
Official Receiver, Krishna Sri T. Sadasha Rao – Respondent


S. S. M. QUADRI, J.

( 1 ) THE short question which falls for determination in this civil revision petit on is whether the judgement-debtor is a parson, "whose interests are affected", within the meaning of Order 21, Rule 90 of the Code of Civil procedure. This question arises in the following circumstances.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has mortgaged his house property. The said propertywas attached in execution of the decree and was sold subject to mortgage. In the meanwhile, the petitioner filed an insolvency petition and oa 19-8-1980 an order was passed appointing Interim Receiver. Tne Receiver took possession on the same date. On 22-9-1980, i e. , about a month later, the property was put to auction. On 21-10-1980 the interim Receiver tiled e. A. 701/80 under Order 21, Rule 90, C. P. C. to set aside tne sale. While the E. A. was pending, the insolvency petition I. P. I/so was dismissed for default on 24-6-1982. Consequently, the court dismissed E-A. 701/80 on 18-11-1982. It appears, in the meanwhile the sale was confirmed on 2-3-1983. Later, the Judgment-debtor filed C. M. A, 15/83 against tne order dated 18-11-1982 dismissing E. A. 701/80. The learned District Judge, krishna dismissed t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top