SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 482

A.SEETHARAM REDDY
Indent: J. Laxmaiah – Appellant
Versus
Indent: J. Laxmaiah – Respondent


A. SEETARAM REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-Andhra bank , aggrieved against the order made in Interlocutory Application no. 301 of 1986, filed by the respondent-plaintiff herein, permitting amendment of the plaint, filed this revision petition, herein, permitting amendment of the plaint, filed this revision petition. The amendment to the plaint sought to incorporate the following :

( 2 ) BY adding the following after para No. 5 :- "para 5-A.- The various documents mentioned in annexure I to the point thought lodged by the plaintiff with the defendant-bank, were not returned to th plaintiff even or the date of the suit. The documents at serial Nos. 1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,14,16,17 and 19 were returned by the defendant bank only on January 10, 1981. The documents referred to at serial nos. 5 and 6 of annexure I are said to have returned by the defendant to the third parties without notice, knowledge or consent of the plaintiff. The defendant has no right t to return the said documents were lodged by the plaintiff with the defendant. The documents referred to at serial nos. 13, 15 and 19 of annexure I have not been returned to the plaintiff till today. Admittedly, the documents mentioned

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top