SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 455

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, Y.V.ANJANEYULU
Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Nataraj Finance Corporation – Respondent


Y. V. ANJANEYULU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in connection with the assessment year 1977-78. The following question of law is referred for the consideration of this court :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the principle of mutuality is satisfied in the case of the assessee-firm and consequently the income of Rs. 48,310 is not taxable for the assessment year 1977-78 ?"

( 2 ) THE assessee describes itself as a firm registered for income-tax purposes. It carries on business in lending money, somewhat unusually, to its partners. Although it is not clear from the record, it is clear that this firm has been carrying on this so-called business for quite some time, because there is an indication that the firm was assessed to tax up to and including the assessment year 1976-77 and tax was paid by the former partners. In the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1977-78, some changes occurred in the constitution of the firm, with the result that a deed of partnership was exec









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top