K.RAMASWAMY
NIDAMARTHY SATYANARAYANA MURTBY – Appellant
Versus
Mamidana Venkata Balakrishna Murthy – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appeal of seven defendants against a preliminary decree ofdissolution of Minerva Talkies, Vizianagaram, a partnership firm (for short the firm ) of which they and the respondents-plaintiff are partners, rendition of accounts and payment of his 1/5th share granted by trial court raises a question whether it is "just and equitable" to dissolve the firm.
( 2 ) THE admitted facts are that on February 1, 1947, a vacant site anda dilapidated building were purchased and a cinema theatre was constructed thereon and from June 2, 1949, the firm started exhibiting cinematographs. Initially the respondent had l/6th share, but on his purchasing the share of another partner he augmented to 1/5th share thereaf and invested Rs. 35,000/ the appellants together have 4/5th share (the details of their respective shares are not necessary ). The partnership deed was executed on January 20, 1970, but due to change of partners another unregistered partnership deed Ex. B1 dated November 9, 1973 was executed. From its inception the 1st appellant was the managing partner, the rest including the respondent are the "sleeping partners". The 1st appellant is a qualified Sound and Radi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.