A. SEETARAM REDDY, J.

( 1 ) AN application (C. M. P. No. 8977/87) has been filed by the tenantin this revision petition to raise an additional ground. So far as the merits of the case are concerned, eviction petition was filed on three counts- (l) wilful default in payment of rent ; 2. Sub-letting and (3) bonafide requirement for personal occupation. The Rent Control Court allowed the petition giving a finding on all the three counts in favour of the respondents landlords. On appeal, though disagreed with the later two counts, the appellate Court, dismissed the same upholding the wilful default in payment of rent and, therefore, confirmed the finding of the first Court. Hence this Civil Revision Petition.

( 2 ) IN this revision petition, C. M. P. No. 8977 of 1987 is filed seekingpermission to raise an additional ground. In short the ground which is sought to be raised is whether it was competent even for the Rent Control court as also the appellate Court as well as this Court to adjudicate upon the merits of this petition filed for eviction in the light of the G. O. M. No. 636, General Administration Department, dt. 29th December, 1983, as the buildings in respect of which the rent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document