M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal is preferred by the plaintiff against the judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Kakinada in A. S. No. , 92/76 which in its turn arose out of O. S. No. 488/73 on the file of the District Munsif s Court, Peddapuram.

( 2 ) THE suit was filed by the appellant-Deity represented by the Executive Officer for possession of the plaint schedule land after ejecting the defendants there from and for future profits. The brief facts as stated in the plaint are like this: The schedule land belongs to the Diety as it was granted to it. The Stanacharya was to look after the administration of the temple and utilise the income for the purpose of Deity. He is therefore in the position of a trustee. The Stanacharya and the Archakas have to take shares for the service of the Deity from out of the income and not the whole income. They have to perform their duties. The patta was granted to the Deity by the Deputy Tahsildar, Peddapuram under the A. P. (Andhra Area) Inams Abolition Act, 1956. An appeal preferred by Yekkirala Laxmi Narasamma before the R. D. O. Peddapuram was dismissed. A further writ petition W. P. No. 1484/64 preferred by the Archakas agai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document