SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 517

V.BHASKARA RAO
J. Rama Murthy – Appellant
Versus
S. C. General M. and C. Agents – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE only question involved in thin appeal is whether the Court below after decreeing the suit can continue inquiry into a petition under O. 38, R. 8, C. P. C. filed pending the suit for raising the order of attachment before Judgment.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are: The property of the appellants was attached by order of the lower Court dt. 24-7-1978. It was an attachment before Judgment in a suit filed for recovery of money by the 1st respondent against 2nd and 3rd respondents. The appellants filed I. A. 619/78 to raise the attachment. The suit was decreed on 9-12-1981. On 12-2-1982, long after decreeing the suit, I. A. 619/78 was dismissed for default. In fact on that very date an adjournment petition for I. A. 619/78 was filed by the appellants. However, that adjournment petition was dismissed on 12-2-82 and also consequently the I. A. 619/78 for default. Therefore on 12-2-1982 itself, the appellants filed I. A. 175/82 to restore I. A. 619/78 dismissed on that very date for default. While dismissing that I. A. the Court below held :". . . . One of the petitioners came to the Court on the same day and filed the present petition. . . . . Therefore I find






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top