V.BHASKARA RAO
J. Rama Murthy – Appellant
Versus
S. C. General M. and C. Agents – Respondent
( 1 ) THE only question involved in thin appeal is whether the Court below after decreeing the suit can continue inquiry into a petition under O. 38, R. 8, C. P. C. filed pending the suit for raising the order of attachment before Judgment.
( 2 ) THE facts of the case are: The property of the appellants was attached by order of the lower Court dt. 24-7-1978. It was an attachment before Judgment in a suit filed for recovery of money by the 1st respondent against 2nd and 3rd respondents. The appellants filed I. A. 619/78 to raise the attachment. The suit was decreed on 9-12-1981. On 12-2-1982, long after decreeing the suit, I. A. 619/78 was dismissed for default. In fact on that very date an adjournment petition for I. A. 619/78 was filed by the appellants. However, that adjournment petition was dismissed on 12-2-82 and also consequently the I. A. 619/78 for default. Therefore on 12-2-1982 itself, the appellants filed I. A. 175/82 to restore I. A. 619/78 dismissed on that very date for default. While dismissing that I. A. the Court below held :". . . . One of the petitioners came to the Court on the same day and filed the present petition. . . . . Therefore I find
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.