SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 594

UPENDRA LAL WAGHRAY, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Barkath Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE following two questions are referred under section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was the owner within the meaning of section 22 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relating to the properties sold to outsiders in respect of which full sale consideration was received and possession was handed over but formal deeds of conveyance executed subsequent to the accounting year relevant to the assessment year under consideration ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee was liable to be taxed as owner under section 22 of the Income-tax Act in respect of the properties handed over to various Sahebzadas by firmans without executing proper deeds of conveyance ?"

( 2 ) THE assessment years concerned here are 1975-76 and 1976-77. It is brought to our notice by learned standing counsel for the Revenue - and, in fact, this fact is also found stated in the order of the Tribunal - that identical questions were referred earlier for the opinion of this court for the assessment years 1959-60 to 1963-64 in the case of this very assessee with respect to the same proper







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top