SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(AP) 648

V.BHASKARA RAO
Kailasa Bhoomiah – Appellant
Versus
Kailasa Eashwaralingam – Respondent


V. BHASKARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE only question in this revision is, whether the list of witnesses filed under Order 16 Rule 1 CPC, can be accepted even if it is so filed beyond 15 days after framing of the issues in the suit.

( 2 ) IN this revision, the application fifed to condone the delay in filing the list of witnesses was dismissed by the lower Court on the ground that it was filed after 10 months of framing of issues. The ground pleaded for delay by the petitioner is that he is old age and not keeping good health. Order 16 rule 1 to the extent relevant and rule 1a are as under:"1. List of Witnesses and summons to witnesses: (1) On or before such date as the Court may appoint, and not later than fifteen days after the date on which the issues are settled, the parties shall present in Court a list of witnesses whom they propose to call either to give evidence or to produce documents and obtain summons to such persons for their attendance in Court. (2) xx xx xx (3) The Court may, for reasons to be recorded, permit a party to call, whether by summoning through court or otherwise any witness, other than those whose names appear in the list referred to in sub-rule (1), if such party sh





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top