A. SEETARAM REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE tenants are the revisionists here. Aggrieved by an order made by the Rent Court resulting in dismissal of the Execution Petition filed by them, this revision petition is filed. A compromise was arrived at in rent proceedings initiated earlier by the respondent-landlord herein whereunder the tenants were to vacate the premises and after reconstruction within 5 months the premises were to be handed over to the tenants with a term that the rents will be enhanced and the premises will be vacated after 3 years. Based on that the tenants filed the E. P. , which is rejected by the Executing court on the ground that the said compromise is registerable and since this is wanting the E. P. , cannot be entertained. The tenants relied on a decision of the Supreme Court in Naibahu vs. La/a Ram Narayan, which on all fours applicable to the case on hand and wherein it is held :"mr. Sanghi also submits that the decree in this case incorported a lease for five years and in absence of registration under Section 17 (1) (d) of the REGISTRATION ACT, 1908 the decree is invalid and cannot be actedupon. As already pointed out this objection is untenable in view of the decisio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document