SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(AP) 44

M.JAGANNADHA RAO
Kammari Kasanna – Appellant
Versus
Vadde Chinnaiah – Respondent


M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the complainant under Sec. 378, Cr. P. C against the judgment in C. C. No 24/1980 dated 31-1- 83 of the Judicial Magistrate of the first Class, Nagarkurnool.

( 2 ) THE complaint filed by the complainant against the two accused is under Section 447, I. P. C. read with Sec. 448, thereof. It is alleged that the complainant and others are absolute owners and possessors of land, bearing s. No 152 of an extent of 16. 34 guntas in Laknaram village, Achempet Taluk. It is alleged that, in the year 1975. the accused No. 1 and accused No. 2 had forcibly evicted the complainant and others from the extent of 3 acres on the east of S. No. 152, shown in red colour in the sketch map, annexed to the complaint. The complainant filed a civil suit O. S. No 67/75 for recovery of possession of the suit land in the Court of the District Munsif, Nagarkurnool, by evicting the accused A-1 and A-2, that the said suit was dismissed on 9-2-76, and the complainants preferred a civil appeal A. S. No. 31/76 to the District Court mahaboobnagar. It is further stated that the said appeal was allowed on 22-9-79, directing restoration of possession in favour of the compl




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top