SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(AP) 95

P.KODANDA RAMAYYA, RAMA RAO
POPURI RAMABRAHMA NANCHARAYYA – Appellant
Versus
PIDIKITI SRIRAMA MURTHY – Respondent


RAMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff is the appellant. the suit is filed for recovery of an amount of Rs. 1, 59,800/- against the 1st defendant personally and against the estate of Ramanavarapu Madhusudana Rao in the hands of defendants 2 to 5.

( 2 ) THE averments in the plaint may be briefly stated :the 1st defendant and r. Madhusudana Rao are owners of a cinema theatre by name vijayalakshmi Talkies at Guntur and they entered into an agreement on 5-12-1973 with the plaintiff granting a right to exhibit films in the theatre from 5-12-1973 to 4-12-1976 on payment of Rs. 40,000/- per annum. On 5-12-1974 the 1st defendant and R. Madhusudana Rao obstructed the plaintiff from exhibiting the film "roti Kapada Aur Makaan" and put up their banner "illarikam . the suit claim comprises a sum of Rs. 34,322-13 being the cash taken away by the defendants, Rs. 10,471-83 towards article retained by the defendants, Rs. 53,523-56 towards profits for the rest of the period for which the plaintiff is prevented from exhibiting the films, rs. 15,944-45 representing the returns from advertisement agency known as beacon Advertisements for the remaining two years, the sum of Rs. 9,350/- towards hire char













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top