SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(AP) 274

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.N.RAO
Competent Authority, Spl. Dy. Collector, L. A. (D) – Appellant
Versus
Thota Penta Reddy – Respondent


JEEVAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE four appeals are preferred by the State under S. 11 of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immoveable Property Act, 1952. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 415/1980 arises from Arbitration Case No. 4/75 pertaining to Ac. 10. 21 guntas in survey No. 165 at Alwal village. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 416/1980 arises from A. c. 3/75 pertaining to Ac. 8. 09 guntas in survey No. 164. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 417/80 arises from A. C. 1/75 pertaining to Ac. 3. 09 guntas in survey No. 162 and Civil Misc. Appeal No. 418/80 arises from A. C. 2/75 pertaining to Ac. 7. 17 guntas in survey No. 163. All these four survey numbers are adjacent to each other. Indeed they form a contiguous block.

( 2 ) THESE lands concerned were requisitioned under the Act in 1966. Acquisition proceedings were commenced in 1971. The competent authority offered to pay compensation at the rate of Rs. 9. 50 ps. per square yard, to which however, the claimants were not agreeable. In A. C. Nos. 1, 2 and 4/75 they claimed at the rate of Rs. 50/- per square yard, while the claimants in A. C. 3/75 claimed at the rate of Rs. 30/- As between the owners and the protected tenants of these lands; an agreement

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top