SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(AP) 336

P.A.CHOUDHARY
BEHARILAL MAUDGIL – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY TO Government Of A. P. , HOME DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDHARY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a local businessman of Secunderabad, He had tenanted a house in Secunderabad belonging to one Mrs. Ranji. The said ranji voluntarily sold her house property to a society called god Has spoken Ministries (R. 3) which is registered under the Hyderabad Societies registration Act. god Has Spoken Ministries has been formed by one henry Poetkar (R. 4) who is a Russian by birth and Canadian by naturalisation and is presently in India on a Canadian passport. Now the petitionertenant seeks through this writ petition to set aside the sale of that house by the said Ranji to the third respondent. It is not the case of the petitioner that his rights as a tenant are, in any way, affected by the sale of the house by Ranji to the third respondent. His objections are wholly legal and his objections to the sale is in no way special to his rights or interests. He alleges that the third respondent is not a validly constituted legal person and its purchase of Ranji s house is hit by the provisions of the Foreign Exchange regulation Act. For that reason he says the sale of Ranji s house should be set aside.

( 2 ) ONE cannot deny that the formation of R. 3 a


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top