SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(AP) 332

M.JAGANNADHA RAO
LALLIPATTU RAMAKRISHNA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
KASALA BALAIAH – Respondent


M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal preferred by defendants 1 and 16 against the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 50/78 on the file of Sub-Court, Gudur, dated 8-3-1979.

( 2 ) THE above suit and O S. No. 10/78 were disposed of together by a common judgment by the learned Subordinate Judge. The four plaintiffs in o. S. No- 50/78 are arrayed as defendants 5 to 60 in O. S. No. 10/78. Defendants 1, 14 and 16 in O. S. No. 50/78 are respectively defendant No. 7, plaintiff and D. 8 in O. S. No. 10/78. There is no appeal by the present appellants who are defendants 7 and 8 in O. S. Np. 10/78 against the judgment and decree therein. The appellants have however preferred an appeal only against the judgment and decree in O. S. No. 50/78.

( 3 ) IN the present suit O. S. No. 50/78 the plaintiffs have sought for a declaration of their title to the plaint schedule land and for delivery of possession thereof and for payment of mesne profits from the date of suit till the date of delivery of possession and costs. The subject matter of the suit consists of two items. The first item is an extent of Ac. 0-08 cents and the second item is of Ac. 2-07 cents. The land is situated in Kuchiwada vill













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top