( 1 ) BOTH the revision to petitions can be disposed of by a common order since the respondent in. both the matters is common.

( 2 ) THE petitioners are tenants. The respondent is the landlord. The respondent filed applications under section 12 (1) of the A. P. Buildings (Lease, rent and Eviction) Control Act. (No. XV of 1960) (for short the Act) in H. R. Cs. 5 and 6 of 1968 for bonafide permission for demolition and for reconstruction of the building on the same premises. The Rent controller ordered the petitions on September 16, 1968. The respondent gave undertakings on september 20, 1968 under Section 12 (2) of the Act that on completion of the construction, he would deliver the same portions to the petitioners. One year time was granted to the respondent to complete the construction and one month thereafter, he was permitted to redeliver possession to the petitioners. Aggrieved by the order of demolition, the petitioners filed CMA S. 22 and 23/68 respectively. The appellate Court confirmed the order of the learned rent Controller by its judgment dated March 12, 1970. During the pendency of the appeals, operation of the order of the learned Rent Controller was suspended. While d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document