SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(AP) 469

P.A.CHOUDHARY, PANDURANGA RAO
V. Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Agricultural Development Officer, Bodhan, Nizamabad District Through The Manager – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDARY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a batch of Writ Petitions filed by the Writ Petitioners challenging the several acts of the various officers of the Co-operative Agricultural development Bank attaching the tractors belonging to the writ petitioners for the realisation of loans earlier advanced by the various branches of the agricultural Development Bank to the writ petitioners for the specific purpose of enabling them to purchase the tractors. Some of these matters have come before us as writ petitions and some others have come before us by way of writ appeals. The facts in all the cases are common and the arguments are also similar. We, therefore, set out the tacts in Writ Petition No. 4593/81 against which Writ Appeal No. 136/82 is preferred, as a representative sample of all the facts and contentions involved in all the Writ Petitions.

( 2 ) THE 1st writ petitioner, V. Venkateswara Rao and his son, the 2ndwrit petitioner Sham Babu borrowed Rs. 40. 000/-, Rs. 35,000/- respectively in the last part of the year 1978 from the Agricultural Development Bank, bodhan of Nizamabad District under the terms of the contract of loan these amounts are repayable in yearly instalments on 1st of


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top