SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(AP) 468

P.A.CHOUDHARY, PANDURANGA RAO
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, I. D. O. , GUNTUR – Appellant
Versus
Andhra Fertilizer Ltd. – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDARY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Writ Appeal filed against the judgment of a learned single Judge allowing W. P. 4815 of 1977 and directing the Assistant Collector, central Excise, Guntur, to refund to the writ petitioner-company an amount of Rs. 3,59, 113-68 which was collected as excise duty from the writ petitioner-company for the period of March, 1969. The quantity of fertilizer which is the subject matter of this writ litigation was manufactured by the petitioner-company by that date. But the fertilizer so produced was packed and was not made ready by then for marketing. On that basis the department demanded on that quantity of fertilizer payment of excise duty by taking the position that although the fertilizer was produced prior to the above crucial date, the production could not be considered complete because the fertilizer was not marketable. The department held that oniy when the fertilizer so produced was loaded into bags and was made marketable, its production should be deemed to be complete. Till than fertilizer should be deemed to have been produced. As the loading of the fertilizer into the bags had taken place subsequent to 1-3-1969, the department had demanded and












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top