SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(AP) 503

K.RAMASWAMY
DEVARAPALLI VENKATA NARASLMHARAO – Appellant
Versus
PILLA RAMAYYAMMA – Respondent


K. RAMA SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is the plaintiff. He filed O. S. No.-226 of 1977 for the recovery of the suit claim and also an LA. under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC for-attachment before judgment on December, 29, 1977. On the same day attachment before judgment was ordered. The first and second defendants filed an application to raise the attachment. The trial Court raised the attachment. Thus this revision petition.

( 2 ) THE first respondent contends that the 3rd respondent entered into an agreement of sale on February, 25, 1975 to sell the attached property to them for a valuable consideration Rs. 35,000/- and a sum of Rs. 20,000/- was paid under a demand draft drawn on the State Bank of India and the balance amount was paid by discharging the debts Of third respondent and cash payments from time to time and the time for execution of the sale-deed was extended upto March, 31, 1978. The first respondent purchased stamps for registration of the documents on December, 20, 1977 and two separate sale deeds were executed in favour of the respondents 1 and 2 on the same day and they were registered on January, 4 1978. Therefore the first respondent has title and interest to the property





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top