SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(AP) 533

A.RAGHUVIR, G.RADHA KRISHNA RAO, SARDAR ALI KHAN
Special Deputy Collector, SRISAIIAM PROJECT (L. A. ) ATMAKAR – Appellant
Versus
B. VENKATA SESHAMMA – Respondent


RAGHUVIR, J.

( 1 ) THE above 26 appeals relate to acquisition of lands. To preface the discussion in the cases, it is not irrelevant to recount sovereign powers of the State which include police power, power of taxation and power to acquire land, often expressed in Latin expression "eminent domain". In the old texts of jurisprudence sovereign power is recounted to include escheat. The modern text book writers on sovereignty consider escheat is more an incident of property than a subject of sovereignty.

( 2 ) IN the pre-constitution days eminent domain power affecting land was reduced in enactment of The LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894, 1 of 1894. The Act specifies the procedure to be followed when land is acquired. The Act also lays down how compensation is to be determined. Compensation is a word which includes the market value of the land and solatium paid to the landholders and sometimes the expression is used to include interest awarded to the landholder. The subject before the Full Bench pertains to interest payable to landholders. The rate of interest in the Act payable was 6% per annum. Solatium of 15% on the market value was paid. In a recent enactment solatium and interest was















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top