SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 36

T.LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY
Angadi Chennaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


T. LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision petition is directed against the conviction and sentence as confirmed by the Additional Sessions judge, Guntur, in Criminal Appeal No. 301/80 dated 21-4-1932 modifying the judgment of the Principal Assistant sessions Judge, Guntur, in S C No 100/ 80. The revision petitioners are A1, a3, A5 and A9. The facts that led to this revision petition are as follows :

( 2 ) SHO, Nagarampalem, filed a charge-sheet against these appellants and 14 others, for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 307, 324, 32i, etc. It is alleged in the charge- sheet that on 8-12-1979, all these cused formed into an unlawful assem- armed with oeadly weapons like spears, axes, etc, and attacked and his party people causing inju-W1 and others. The case was as Crime No. 262/79 P S nagarampalem. The learned Magistrate i. e. , the Additional Judicial Magistrate of II Class, Guntur, committed the accused to take the trial under various sections of the Code to the Court of the sessions in his order dated: 30-6-1980 in P R C No. 9/1980. The learned principal Assistant Sessions Judge tried the accused for various offences in S C no. 100/80 and found the accused 1 to










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top