SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 7

M.JAGANNADHA RAO, P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
MUNGAMURU LAKSHMIDEVAMMA – Appellant
Versus
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, AND REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAVALI – Respondent


JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE question of law that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether the Vendor of immovable property under an oral sale is entitled to claim a charge under Section 55 (4) (b) of the TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 for the unpaid purchase money against the vendee after the expiry of 12 years from the date of the oral sale when the vendee has acquired title by adverse possession ?

( 2 ) THE above question has arisen in a reference under Sec. 31 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act which was disposed of in OP. No. 21/81 by the learned subordinate Judge, Kavali. The contest was between the two respodents before the lower court of whom M. Lakshmi devamma was the first claimant while her brother J Chandras-khara Reddy was the second claimant.

( 3 ) 2. 36 Hectars of land was acquired in the village of Leguntapadu in Nellore District by a notificition published on 16-10 1979 under sec. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. The compensation payable according to the award was sum of Rs. 67,035-76. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an award dt. 11-3-81 for the said sum in favour of the rightful owner and made a reference on 14-4-1981 to the Civil Court under Sec. 31 (2) of
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top