SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 3

K.RAMASWAMY
KASULANATI LAKSHMI NARASAMMA – Appellant
Versus
CHINTALAPALLI VENKATA SUBBAIAH – Respondent


K. RAMA SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) THE appeal is filed against an order of remand of the appellate court setting aside the decree of the trial Court for a sum of Rs. 1300/ and directing the trial court to frame appropriate issues and dispose of the suit according to law after giving an opportunity to the parties.

( 2 ) THE circumstances under Which the suit came to be filed are that the respondentplaintiff and the appellantsdefendants 1 and 2 are co-owners and the 3rd appellant was inducted as a tenant of the appellants 1 and 2. The respondent had a half share and the appellants 1 and 2 had half share in the plaint schedule property. The respondent laid the suit for rendition of account of his share of the profits which the appellants 1 and 2 had realised from the lands. Parties went into trial on that account. The trial court held that since the parties are co-owners having co-extensive right in the property, the suit to render account is not maintainable. However, it decreed the suit for a sum of Rs. 1300/- being the share of the respondent. Dissatisfied with the decree, the appellants carried the matter in appeal to the lower Court. The lower court while agreeing with the trial court that t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top