A.LAKSHMANA RAO, P.CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, P.KODANDA RAMAYYA
V. Govindarajulu – Appellant
Versus
Regional Transport Officer, Anantapur – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE cases raise a vexed question of considerable importance, frequently faced by the transport authorities and owners of public service vehicles and agitated before the Courts. The question is when is a contract carriage as defined under Section 2 (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, (for brief the Act) said to have been used as a stage carriage as defined under section 2 (29) of the Act in order to attract the levy and demand of the increased rate of tax for a stage carriage as notified under section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963 (for brief the Taxation Act ). Is it necessary for the levy of tax as a stage carriage that the owner of the public service vehicle should hold a valid permit to ply it as a stage carriage? When one of the cases, W. P. No. 15820 of 1984 came up for hearing before Jeevan Reddy and Sardar Ali Khan, JJ. , the learned Judges felt that the course of judicial authority on the question had not been steady but teetered particularly after the Division Bench decision of this Court in W. P. No. 3714 of 1982 and it was therefore not only desirable but necessary to have an authoritative pronouncemen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.