SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 387

M.JAGANNADHA RAO
Divanchee Bar and Restaurant, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad – Respondent


M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application filed by the 4th writ petitioner for the appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner to act as an observer and report whether the petitioner is observing the Hyderabad Amusement Rules and, if so, whether the police are unnecessarily booking cases against the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE main writ petition is filed by five Bars and Restaurants and three Artists for the issue of directions to the Commissioner of Police (1st respondent) not to insist on quarterly licences under the Hyderabad Amusement Rules and for a declaration that the licences already issued to petitioners 1 to 5 will be valid till the 30th of Aban of the year. The petitioners also asked for a declaration that they are entitled to provide performances of all dances including Cabaret dances and for a direction to the Commissioner of Police not to interfere with or obstruct the dances shown in the petitioners Restaurants, including Cabaret dances and for a direction to the Commissioner of Police and his subordinates not to forcibly enter into the Bars and Restaurants of the petitioners unless there is a complaint of a cognizable offence and for a declaration that Rules 112 (a),
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top