SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 454

P.KODANDA RAMAYYA, RAMA RAO
Rasaranjan – Appellant
Versus
Y. Raja Rajaswari – Respondent


P. KODANDARAMAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of six Revision petitions arise out of Land Acquisition proceedings and they relate to questions of execution.

( 2 ) A learned single Judge referred these cases to a Division Bench. The facts leading to this reference may be stated: The land belonged to one s R Y Sivaramaprasad, the Raja of of Challapalli was acquired under the land Acquisition Act 1 of 1894. The original owner entered into an agreement to sell these lands with one Seshagiri rao, Managing partner of Lalitha Enterprises prior to the acquisition proceedings and hence the purchaser also was entitled to compensation. The Collector passed an award fixing the compensation and the claim for higher compensation was referred to civil court in 0 P nos. 148 and 304/74 on the file of additional Chief Judge-cum Additional metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. The Revision Petitioners and some others who are claimants in those Land Acquisiton proceedings being partners of lalitha Enterprises relinquished their claim in favour of the said Seshagiri Rao and gave affidavits to that effect and those affidavits were filed in the civil court where the reference was pending and they were marked




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top