SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 508

M.JAGANNADHA RAO
P. C. Kakar – Appellant
Versus
Director General of Police Government Of A. P. Hydbad – Respondent


M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) CAN a Magistrate refuse, on the ground of want of facilities, to consider a plea of an accused for bail under section 167 Cr. P. C or for remand to judicial custody, whenapproached at his residence bayond court hours or on a holiday but within twenty four hours of the arrest and if so he refuses, does it not amount to a violation of the fundamental right to liberty guaranteed in arts. 21 and 22 (2) of the Constitution of India and of the provisions of sections 56,57 Cr. P. C. ? Can an oral application for bail be refused as not maintainable on the ground that the application is not in writing ? These are the two main important questions that arise in this writ petition.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts of the case are the following;- The first petitioner. Dr. P. C. Kakar, is a Doctor practising in hyderabad. According to the allegations in the writ petition he passed M. S. and obtained his Post-Graduate Degree from u. S. A. He is running a hospital under the name and style of rai Bahadur dwarakanath Hospital at D. No. 1-127, saroornagar, Hyderabad. The 2nd petitioner is said to be his wife and she is also said to be a Doctor in Indian medicine assisting the 1st



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top