P. KODANDARAMAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of a suit and a counter suit filed by the parties. C C C A 181/82 is filed against the judgment and decree in 0 S No,1052/80. This suit is laid for possession against the defendents. It is averred in the plaint that the defendants who obtained a nominal agreement to sell dated 11-4-72 from the mother of the plaintiff, purporting to represent the plaintiff when he was a minor for purchasing the suit land belonging to the plaintiff of an extent of acs. 4-01 guntas, comprised in survey no. 115 in Thokatta Village Secunderabad taluk, Hyderabad District, trespassed on the land in the second week of october, when the plaintiff refused to accept their claim to convey the title in the property. There are three defendants in the suit. The 1st defendant is the husband of the 2nd defendant and the 3rd defendant is their son.

( 2 ) THE defence is that the agreement is true and valid and the representation of the mother as guardian to the plaintiff is valid and the defendants took possession of the property, in pursuance of the agreement, and improved the same and the plaintiff, who could not obtain the necessary permission due to the proh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document