Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : V.RAMASWAMI
Sri Srinivasa Co. - Appellant
Versus
Firm, V.D.H.A.Setti - Respondent
A.S. No. 14/7
Decided On : 01-17-84
Advocates Appeared :
Mr. N. Rama Mohana Rao
Held : The proviso to Sec 34 was introduced by the Legislature that in a case where the party entitled to money and its use thereof but was unjustly denied of its enjoyment, the person found responsible therefor be mulcted with that liability as a measure of compensation and interest at the rates at which the moneys were lent or advanced by the nationalised Banks on the commercial transactions be the principle to assess the same, The industry trade or business transactions in which, the party incurred liability, was treated by Explanation II to proviso to Sec34 to the Commercial transactions
In this case, admittedly there is no contract to pay interest at a particular rate Therefore from the date when the liability arose the appellant claimed interest 18% per annum as trade, custom and usage There may exist trade, custom and usage to pay interest an undischarged debt With a view to make evil of trade, custom of usage, it is incumbent on the appellant to adduce evidence as to what is the rate of interest prevalent as per the trade, custom usage Since Sec5 of the Interest Act has expressly saved the power of the Court under Sec 34 CPC, the Court, in exercise of the direction ordered interest 12% per annum on the outstanding amount from the due date In the absence Of any material evidence placed on-record, it cannot be characterised that the view of the lower Court is unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious
( 1 ) THE appellant is the plaintiff. He filed the suit for recovery of certain amounts said to be due from the respondent-defendant. The trial Court decreed the suit. In so far as the principal amount is concerned, I am not concerned in this appeal. The appellant claimed interest on the basis of trade, custom and usage at the rate of 18% per annum on the amounts outstanding. The trial Court decreed the suit with interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Dissatisfied with the difference of the rate of interest at 6% the present appeal is filed.
( 2 ) IT is contended for the appellant that having held that there is trade custom and usage the trial Court ought to have granted interest as prayed for. It is contended that the liability was incurred in connection with the business dealings. Therefore under proviso to S. 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure the appellant is entitled to rate of interest charged by the Nationalised Banks on the money lent on commercial transactions. The rate of interest chargeable by the nationalised Banks is 18%. Therefore the appellant is entitled to 18% as claimed. A party is entitled to interest as agreed to between the parties to the contract. In its absence the Court is given power to order interest from the date of the suit till the date of decree at such rate as it deems reasonable to be paid on the principal sum adjudged in addition to any interest adjudged on such principal sum for any period prior to the institution of the suit. The Court is also empowered to order further interest at such rate not exceeding 6% per annum from the date of the decree to the date of payment or to such earlier date as it thinks fit. The Legislature amended this provision and introduced proviso to S. 34 through the Civil Procedure Code (Amending) Act (104 of 1976 ). The proviso reads thus :"provided that where the liability in relation to the sum so adjudged had arisen out of a commercial transaction, the rate of such further interest may exceed six per cent per annum, but shall not exceed the contractual rate of interest or where there is no contractual rate, the rate at which monies are lent or advanced by nationalised Banks in relation to commercial transactions. "it postulates that where liability in relation to the sum adjudged by the Court arose out of commercial transaction, then the Court is given power to order interest exceeding 6% per annum where there is no contractual rate, the rate at which the Nationalised Banks lent or advanced monies in relation to commercial transactions. Explanation II to the proviso says that the money adjudged could be construed to be commercial transaction when the liability is incurred in connection with the industry, trade or business of a party. Admittedly this is a case where the liability was incurred by the respondent in connection with the business transaction. But the question is, what is the rate of interest to which the Nationalised Banks charge on monies lent or advanced in relation to the commercial transactions.
( 3 ) THE Interest Act (14 of 1978) also gives power to the Court in certain circumstances to charge interest on debts or damages in any proceedings in which a claim for interest in respect of any debt or damages already paid is made. S. 3 thereof empowers the Court to allow interest. Subsection (1) of S. 3 adumbrates that in any proceedings for the recovery of any debt or damages or in any proceedings in which a claim for interest in respect of any debt or damages already paid is made, the Court may, if it thinks fit, allow interest to the person entitled to the debt or damages or to the person making such claim, as the case may be "at a rate not exceeding the current rate of interest," for the whole or part for a period specified in clauses (a) and (b) thereunder. S. (2) (b) defines "current rate of interest to mean the highest of the maximum rates at which interest may be paid to the different classes of deposits (other than those maintaine
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.