SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(AP) 50

M.JAGANNADHA RAO, P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
MUTHAVARAPU VENKATESWARA RAO – Appellant
Versus
N. SUBBARAO – Respondent


( 1 ) THE question that falls for consideration in this appeal relates to the power of the Court to grant stay under Section 34 of the Indian arbitration ACT, 1940, 1940 in cases invlving allegations of fraud or allegations affecting prefessional reputation.

( 2 ) THE respondent filed the suit O. S. No. 580 of 1982 in the Court of the Subordinate Jndge, Vijayawada for settlement of accounts of the 1st defendant firm "sri Venkateswara Estates" and for rendition of accounts and for allotting to the respondent his share of 10 paisc in the property and in the amounts that may be found due on settlement of accounts. Ho also alternatively claimed for dissolution of the said firm and settlement of accounts and for the appointment of a receiver.

( 3 ) ORIGINALLY there was a registered partnership deed dated 27-11-1975 which is marked as Ex. B-l. in these proceedings. The partnership was at will and consisted of 17 partners. One of the partners gave a site of 6000 square yards for the purpose of construction of a commercial complex at vijayawada. The plaintiff owned a share of 10 paise while the remaining shares were owned by the other partners. On 1-10-1976 the partner who gave the site f










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top