PUNNAIAH
Konduru Ammannachary – Appellant
Versus
Rahima Khatoon – Respondent
( 1 ) THE revision petitioners are the tenants in respect of the premises bearing door Nos, 8-4-45 and 8-4-47 in the llth Ward in petitioner. Srikakulam town. The two premises belong to one Abdulla Khan. He has two sons and one daughter viz, Babu Khan, Hyder Khan and rahima Khatoon. These two premises were leased out by Abdulla Khan to the petitioners herein. Abdulla Khan has been collecting rents from the petitiners from the beginning even by the date of the petitioners. Hyder Khan and Rahima Khatoon claimed that Abdulla Khan executed registered settlement deeds Exs. A-1, date 6-4-1975 In favour of Rahima khatoon and Ex. A-11, date 6-4-1975 in favour of Hyder Khan and hence they are the owners of the two premises and consequently they become the landlords in respect of the two premises. They, therefore, issued lawyer notices Exs. A-6 and A-16 date 21-12-1977 to the petitioners informing them that they become the title holders under the settlement deeds exs. A-1 and A-11 and consequently they became the landlords in respect of the two premises in the occupation of the petitioners and they should, therefore, pay rents to them but not to their father, Abdulla Khan. The co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.