SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(AP) 104

P.A.CHOUDHARY
Morramreddi Rami Reddi – Appellant
Versus
Kundanala Aravindamma – Respondent


( 1 ) DEFENDANTS 3 and 4 are the Appellants in this appeal filed against the decree and judgment in O. S. No. 81 of 1974 on the file of the Subordinate judge, Cuddapah. The suit was filed by the plaintiff who is the daughter of one Seshacharyulu. Kandalam Seshacharyulu had two wives. By the first wife, he had a son by name Ramanujacharyulu and a daughter, the plaintiff. After the death of his first wife, Seshacharyulu married his second wife and by that alliance he had a daughter.

( 2 ) SESHACHARYULU died intestate on 2. 11. 1971 leaving behind him the plaintiff-daughter, the second wife-1st defendant and the daughter by his second wife-second defandant. Ramanujacharyulu s whereabouts were not known since the year 1966. After the death of Seshacharyulu, his second wife and the daughter had sold away certain properties to third parties. Now, the plaintiff-daughter filed a suit for declaration of her title to an extent of 3/4 share of the suit property, for recovery of posession and mense profits. The suit was dismissed as regards Item no. 6 with which we are not concerned in this appeal. But the suit was decreed as regards Items 1 to 4. The suit Items 1 and 2 were purchased by the t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top