M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE main question involved in this revision is as to whether the power of attorney executed by the 2nd defendant in favour of the petitioner -plaintiff on 8-1-1977 prima facie satisfied the legal requirements for being construed as an irrevocable power of attorney.

( 2 ) THIS is a revision preferred by the plaintiff in O. S. No. 2380/82 on the file of the 3rd Assistant judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The suit was filed for the grant of a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs possession and management of the plaint schedule properties and from demolishing item 1 of the plaint schedule. The schedule to the plaint consists of two items. Item No. 1 is a double storied building bearing No. 5-9-195 Chiragalli Lane, Hyderabad while the second item is a vacant site admeasuring 1393 square yards bearing No. 5-9-88/1 and 2 at pateh Maidan, Chapel Road, Hyderabad. Pending suit the petitioner prayed for the issue of a temporary injunction restraining the defendants respondents from interfering with the petitioners possession and management of the schedule mentioned properties and more particularly from demolishing it

Click Here to Read the rest of this document