SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(AP) 181

P.A.CHOUDHARY
A. MANIK RAO – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR, DMRL, P. O. KANCHAN BAGH, HYD. – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDHARY, J.

( 1 ) WHAT are the limits to the power of the State to refuse to appoint a citizen to work for the State That important question falls for consideration in this petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioner had passed in November, 1970, his S. S. C. examination conducted by the Board of Secondary Education and his Intermediate examination in March 1973, conducted by the Board of Intermediate Education. Almost immediately thereafter, he joined in August, 1973 the course of Turner Trade in the Boys Town Industrial Training Centre, Hyderabad and completed it by coming out successful in. the month of July, 1976 in the All India Trade Test conducted by the National Counsel for Training in Vocational Trades. In that All India Trade Test, ihe petitioner earned credit of being the best trainee of the Boys Town Industrial Training institute. From the beginning the petitioner has been an earnest young man devoted to his studies. After passing the trade test the petitioner worked as Turner in some private industry for a period of ten months from 1-8-76 to 27-5-77, From 25-10-77 to 14-11-78 he underwent training in the Trade of Turner under the Apprenticeship Act, 1961 in the Hindusthan ae















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top