SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(AP) 263

JEEVAN REDDY, Y.V.ANJANEYULU
M. G. Brothers – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of and Income tax, A. P. – Respondent


ANJANEYULU, J.

( 1 ) THE Income-tax appellate Tribunal referred the following two questions of the law for the opinion of this Court under Sec. 256 (l) of the income-tax Act, 1961 (1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified In holding that the loss sustained by the assessee In the forward transactions In caster seed oil and neem oil was loss sustained In speculation business? (2) Whether on the facts and In the circumstance of the case the Tribunal was justified In holding that there was no right of appeal against the levy of Interest under Sec. 215 of the Income-tax act, 19617

( 2 ) THE assessee, a partnership firm, carries on business in the manufacture and sale of groundnut oil and its by-products. For the income tax assessment year 1973-74, the assessee filed its return declaring income of Rs. 2,90,807/ -. While declaring the income as above, the assessee claimed that it suffered loss of Rs. 1,60,946/- in respect of certain transactions which it entered into in cotton-seed oil and neem oil. It is not disputed that this loss was suffered by paying different pursuant to settlement of the contracts otherwise than by delivery of goods. Th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top