SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(AP) 337

K.RAMASWAMY
KAMBHAMPATI SAVAMMA. – Appellant
Versus
G. RADHAKRISHNA MOORTHY. – Respondent


K. RAMA SWAMY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is the defendant in the Lower Court. The revision arises against the order in I. A. No. 1735/82, filed under Section 151 c. P. C. to direct the respondent to demolish the wall and eves constructed by him in the first floor of the suit building.

( 2 ) THE admitted facts are that the respondent was residing in the house bearing No. 11-31-27, Park Road, Vijayawada as a tenant. The petitioner filed suit O. S. 1546/80, in the lower court for perpetual injunction restraining the landlord of the respondent from interfering with the possession and making any further constructions. In I. A. No 6002/80 the trial Court issued temporary injunction on December 6, 1980 restraining the landlord of the respondent from making any constructions. The respondent claiming to be the tenant in the plaint schedule property under an oral lease he was authorised to construct A B wall and eves at c D and when he made arrangements by stocking the material for construction thereof the petitioner was interfering with the construction, filed the suit, O. S. 1521/80 for permanent injunction to restrain the petitioner and her men from interfering with his possession of the por









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top