SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 29

CHENNAKESAVA REDDY, P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
State Of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
A. Vijaualakshmi – Respondent


CHENNAKESAV REDDI, J.

( 1 ) IN these cases, the petitioner are all students they have been successful at the Intermediate Examination and are aspirants for higher education - A Degree in Medicine and surgery. They have taken the Entrance Examination for the M. B. B. S. course in the Medical colleges in the state for the Academic year 1982-83.

( 2 ) THE Board of Examiners. In exercise of it discretion got the answer scrips mechanically valued by way of computers. The petitioners wrongly coded the Roll numbers on the answer scripts in breach of the instructions specifically given to the examinees in that behalf. The computer rejected their answer scripts they, therefore now seek a direction of the Director of Medical Education and Chairman Board of Examiners, Medical Entrance Examination hyderabad to have the answer scripts valued manually and allot seats, if they are eligible in the order of merit. They claim that the manual valuation has been arbitrarily denied by the chairman. Board of Examiners. Although they are legally entitled to for such valuation under R. 14 (b) of the rules for selection of candidates for admission to the 1st year M. B. B. S course in the Medical college in














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top