SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 197

K.MADHAVA REDDY, P.A.CHOUDHARY
B. D. SATYANANDAM – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) I have had the advantage of reading the valued opinion recorded by my learned brother Choudary, J. Being, however, unable to persuade myself to concur with that opinion, I proceed to record my own.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of the writ petition have been stated by my learned brother and I deem it sufficient to rtcapitulate the barest minimum necessary to make this judgment self-contained.

( 3 ) THE petitoner is a teacher iff the service of the Government of andhra Pradesh and was posted in Zone I of the State at Vumaravilli in srikakulam District. He was transferred from that place and posted to kurnool, a town in Zone VI of the State. That order was assailed by him before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in R. P. No. 957/1981 (hereinafter referred to as Administrative Tribunal ). Pending the disposal of that matter, at his request, the Administrative Tribunal suspended the order of transfer. As a consequence, the Government did not implement its order of transfer. Later, on 4-8-1981, the Government suspended the petitioner from service pending enquiry into same charges. The legality and propriety of this order also was questioned by him in R P No. 1414/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top