K.MADHAVA REDDY, P.A.CHOUDHARY
B. D. SATYANANDAM – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) I have had the advantage of reading the valued opinion recorded by my learned brother Choudary, J. Being, however, unable to persuade myself to concur with that opinion, I proceed to record my own.
( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of the writ petition have been stated by my learned brother and I deem it sufficient to rtcapitulate the barest minimum necessary to make this judgment self-contained.
( 3 ) THE petitoner is a teacher iff the service of the Government of andhra Pradesh and was posted in Zone I of the State at Vumaravilli in srikakulam District. He was transferred from that place and posted to kurnool, a town in Zone VI of the State. That order was assailed by him before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in R. P. No. 957/1981 (hereinafter referred to as Administrative Tribunal ). Pending the disposal of that matter, at his request, the Administrative Tribunal suspended the order of transfer. As a consequence, the Government did not implement its order of transfer. Later, on 4-8-1981, the Government suspended the petitioner from service pending enquiry into same charges. The legality and propriety of this order also was questioned by him in R P No. 1414/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.