SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 177

P.A.CHOUDHARY, T.LAKSHMI NARAYANA REDDY
B. Battabhirmayva – Appellant
Versus
B. Gopalakrishnayya – Respondent


P. A. CHOUDARY, J.

( 1 ) ONE Bangaru Gopalkrishnaiah filed O. S. No. 57 of 1966 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Narsapur. That suit was for partition and separate possession of his share of the plaint schedule properties which stood alienated in favour of the 8th defendant under a document dt. 11-7-1978. The consideration under that impugned sale was, received by the 4th defendant. In the suit filed by Bangaru Gopalakrishnaiah, the appellants herein, were added as the defendants 5 to 7 because these appellants-defendants along with the plaintiff were admittedly entitled to equal shares in the suit properties. The defendants 5 to 7 in an effort to promote their interests have supported in their written statement the claim of the plaintiff for partition of suit properties among the various sharers and claimed their share in them and also sought the cancellation of the alienations of the suit properties in favour of the 8th defendant.

( 2 ) THE suit developed teething troubles. The first complication was caused by the 4th defendant filing I. A. No. 674/1970 seeking to have the suit claim compromised in terms of an alleged compromise which the defendants 5 to 7 opposed. The propo











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top