SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 153

P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
V. MADHAVA RAO – Appellant
Versus
N. SHANKAR REDDY – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision is directed against an adinterim injunction issued by the district Judge Karimnagar in I. A. No. 67/83 in C. M. A. No. 5/83 on his file

( 2 ) THE material facts can be briefly noticed. The two petitioners are defendants 2 and 3 in O. S. No. 9/83 on the file of the Subordinate Judge. Karimnagar. The 1st defendant is the State Bank of India Officers association (hereinafter called the Association) represented by its President Sri kotaiah. That Association is the 2nd repondent in this revision. The 2nd defendant is the General Secretary of the Association. The 3rd defendent is the Chairman of the Election Committee of the Association. The 1st resppondent who is the plaintiff in the suit is a Member of the Association. He filed the suit for a declaration that the defendants have no locus standi to hold election of Officer-Bearers to thelst defendant Association. Pending suit he applied for the grant of a temporary injunction. The Subordinate Judge by his order dated 18-3-1983 directed issue of urgent notice. The order of the Subordinate Judge read:"the relief of injunction has not been asked in the O. S. Hence it cannot be said that the purpose







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top