SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 232

P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
Rajasekharan – Appellant
Versus
Paramartha Bhushanam Nathella Sampathu Chetty, Chgrities, Nathella Narayana Gupta – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THESE various revisions filed by the individual tenants under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control, 1960 arise on the following meterial facts.

( 2 ) THE property in question, which is situated in Tirupathi originally belonged to the family of one Nathella sampathu Chetty, a philanthropist of madras. The building consisted of a ground floor consisting of two portions and a first floor which was consisting of about twelve rooms. The two par- tions in the ground floor as also the individual rooms in the first floor were let out, some to students and some to employees on varying rates of monthly rent. Nathella Sampathu Chetty, by a will executed by him before his death, donated the house property at Tirupathi for charities to be run under the name of messers. Paramarth Bhasha- nam Nathella Sampathu Chetty charities". Neither the will nor a copy thereof have been produced despite repeated and adequate opportunities given. It is, however common ground that the object of the trust is to render financial aid to poor people for marriage purposes, to feel Brahmins during Brahmostavam time at Tirupathi pilgrim Centre and











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top