A.SEETHARAM REDDY, C.V.RAMULU
N. V. Chowdary – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. , Visakhapatnam – Respondent
SEETHARAMA REDDY, J.
( 1 ) THESE two C. M. As. Arise out of a common order and so they will be disposed of by a common judgment.
( 2 ) THE appellant filed a suit in O. S. No. 150/83 on the file of the Ist Additional Subordinate Judge, Vizag. , for permanent injunction and pending the same, he filed I. A. 291/83 for interim injunction restraining the respondent from terminating the contract. The interim injunction was granted. Thereafter the respondent herein filed two applications I. A. 280/83 for vacating the interim injunction and I. A. 281/83 for stay of trial of the suit under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. By common order dated 15-7-1983, the injunction was vacated and stay of the trial of the suit was ordered. Hence, the aforesaid two C. M. As.
( 3 ) A brief format of the case may be drawn: Visakhapatnam Steel Project (V. S. P.), entered into a contract with the respondent-company, a Government of India Undertaking, with the 100% share-capital, for levelling up the entire land within the area earmarked towards the Project. The respondent in turn entered into various subcontracts, the one being in favour of the appellant-sub-contractor herein. The work entrusted to the app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.