SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 331

A.RAGHUVIR, P.R.RAO
Poosarla Venkata Ratnamma Power of Attorney holder V. Someswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Sivakoti Sundara Ratnamma – Respondent


RAMARAO, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff is the appellant. This appeal arises out of a suit filed for recovery of the principal amount of Rs. 15,000. 00 and interest thereon on the foot of a mortgage. The defendants are the successors to late Sivakoti Laxmanrao and also Narayanrao and as such they are liable to pay the debt due under the mortgage executed by their predecessors. As the defendants failed to pay interest on the mortgage amount the plaintiff filed a suit O. S. 473/1970 on the file of District Munsif Court, Visakhapatnam, and a decree was passed for interest payable up to 23-9-1970. Subsequent to the decree also the defendants failed to pay interest and also the principal and therefore the suit is filed. The written statement was filed on behalf of the defendants stating that the plaintiff should be put to strict proof of passing the consideration and the mortgage does not bind the defendants. The plaintiff has to prove that the debt incurred is for the benefit of the joint family. Further, the present suit is barred under Order 2, Rule 2, C. P. C. , in view of the filing of the suit O. S. 473/1970. The suit filed by the power of attorney also is questioned as illegal and void.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top