SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 326

A.RAGHUVIR, RAMA RAO
V. Bala Krishna – Appellant
Versus
V. Lalitha – Respondent


RAMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal, at the instance of the petitioner-husband, arises out of a petition filed under S. 12 (1) (b ). Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for annulment of the marriage. The averments in support of the petition may be briefly stated: The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent took place on 14-12-1980 and they both lived together as husband and wife for 23 days. The respondent during that period had recurrent attacks of epilepsy. When the respondent had epilepsy attack on 8-12-1980 the petitioner took the respondent to Dr. G. Nagabhushanam, who opined that she was having epilepsy and gave prescription. After enquiry the petitioner came to know that the respondent had attack of epilepsy about 2 years prior to the marriage after seeing her mother in Gandhi Hospital and again she had another attack when she failed in her B. A. examination. When the respondent had the attack on 8-12-1980 the father of the respondent came and took the respondent to his house. On 14-12-1980 the father of the respondent came and when he was asked by the elders he admitted that the respondent was having epilepsy. Because of the incurable disease which the respondent is having and










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top