SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 346

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, SARDAR ALI KHAN
BAADELA NAGARAJU - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Crl. A. No. 127/81
Decided On : 10-04-83
Advocates Appeared :
Mr. P. Innayya Reddy

Headnote:EVIDENCE ACT. Sec. 6, Illustration (a - Murder committed in an arrack shop - First Information Report given by Shop owner who witnessed the offence - Death of shop owner before trial - His statement is admissible in evidence.

       Held: The declaration made subsequent to the occurrence is admissible provided it can be validly assumed that the existing influence continued. While examining whether the declaration is connected with the fact in issue so as to form part of the same transaction, all the surroundings circumstances obtaining in each case have to be taken into consideration. In the incident case the conduct of D in not immediately rushing to the Police Station does not give room for the assumption that his declaration was not contemporaneous or that the interval was such as to allow fabrication. The conditions for admissibility of such a statement or the proximity of time, the proximity of the Police Station, continuity of action. The statement of D as contained in Ex. P satisfy the requirements of Sec. 6 of the evidence act and therefore it is admissible,

       Criminal Appeal Partly Allowed.

       

JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) ALL the six accused in S. C. No. 29/1980 on the file of the learned sessions Judge, Nellore are the appellants. They are found guilty under section 148 I. P. C. and each of them is sentenced to undergo two years rigorous imprisonment. They are also convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 I. P. C, and each of them is sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. A-1 is further convicted under Section 324 I. P. C. and sentenced to suffer one year rigorous imprisonment.

( 2 ) THE prosecution ease is as follows. All the six accused and the material witnesses in the case are the residents of Nellore town; One ingifala Suresh kumar, hereinafter referred to ai the deceased, is a resident of rayapu Malawada, Nellore town and he was working as an employee in ridha-Madhav theatre. P. W. 3 and one Chitti Babu are his brothers. There have been misunderstandings between the accused on one hand and the deceased and his brothers on the other. About one and half years prior to the occurence, one Navakoti Sukumar, an associate of A-1 was murdered and Chitti Babu, the brother of the deceased and the deceased figured as accused, but the case ended in acquittal. About four years ago, a-I, A-4 and Sukumar, the deceased in the other case filed a case against the deceased in this case and that case also ended in acquittal. One year prior to the present occurrence, A-2 stabbed P. W. 3 and in that connection, a case was filed in the court of the Second Additional Judicial First Class magistrate, Nellore and the same is pending trial. Because of the acquittal of the deceased in the other two cases, the accused bore grudge against him and they were waiting for an opportunity to do away with the deceased.

( 3 ) ONE Gangapatnam Dayakar was working as a clerk under a Kerala arrack contractor in the depot situated to the east of Atmakur bus stand. P. W. I, at the relevant time, was working as a cooly at the Railway Goods shed and the lorry stand and he is a friend of the deceased. Both of them used to visit the arrack shop of Dayakar to asume arrack. On 16-12-1979 at about 11-30 P. M. the deceased and P. W. went to the arrack shop and sat on a bench and asked Dayakar to serve irrack. Just then A-1 to A-6, having formed themselves into an unlawful assembly, entered the arrack shop. A-l was armed with an axe and A-2 to A-6 were armed with knives and iron rods. Having entered their shop, A-l shouted saying that the deceased cannot escape the death. So saying, he hacked the deceased with the axe on his chin. The deceased fell down from the bench. Thereafter A-2 to A-6 stabbed the deceased and also beat him indiscriminatly all over the body with knives and iron rods. The deceased died on the spot. P. W. 2 who is a licenced cooly of the Road, Transport Corporation at Atmakur bus stand also proceeded to the shop of Dayakar to cousume arrack. On the way he stopped for urination and when he got up, he saw the accused entering the arrack shop. Then he went near the shop and paeped through a hole in the thatty on the southern side of the arrack shop and witnessed the occurrence. Thus P. Ws. 1 and 2 and Oayakar witnessed the occurrence. As the accused were stabbing the deceased, P. W. I questioned the accused about their highhanded act and A-1 took a knife from one of his associates and stabbed P. W. I with the knife on the left wrist of p. W. I. Thereafter, the accused ran away. Seeing the occurrence, Dayakar in whose shop the deceased was stabbed to death stayed for some time and then went to No. 2 Town Police station and presented a report Ex. P-9 to the Head Constable P. W. 9 at about 1 A. M. P. W. 9 registered the crime and issued express. F. I. Rs. The Inspector of Police, City Crime station, nellore P. W. ll received the F. i. R. and took up the investigation. On 17-12-1979 at about 7 A. M. P. W. 11 inspected the scene of offence, seized the Wood-staintd earth from the place of occurrence add held the inquest, during the inque










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top