SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 444

A.RAGHUVIR, G.RAMANUJULU NAIDU
Pingle Madhusudhan Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Controller of EState Duty – Respondent


RAGHUVIR, J.

( 1 ) THE above three reference are made to this court under the E. D. Act, 1953 (34 of 1933) (the Act), relevant to the estate of Pingle Venkatrama Reddy, who died on 3/06/1965. The questions in the reference relate to three life insurance policies obtained by the deceased. Two of the policies relate to a company, by name, Phoenix Assurance Company (Bombay company); the third, relates to the standard Life Insurance Company (the Calcutta company ). The question principally is :whether the proceeds of the policies should be aggregated with the general estate of the deceased, for determination of rate to ascertain the duty payable under the Act.

( 2 ) THE three policies the assured obtained for Rs. 50,000 each. On the Bombay policies, the assured on 13/10/1941, and, for the second time on 15/10/1981, (sic) had taken loans from the Bombay company. From the statement of facts, it is not known what sums were borrowed. On the Calcutta company policy, the assured obtained on 8/06/1933, a sum of Rs. 30,000 and on 17/11/1951, another sum of Rs. 58,000. The undischarged debts on the policies were ascertained to be 71,250. The assured, during his lifetime, on 27/09/1954, assigned















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top