( 1 ) IN this appeal, the unsuccessful plaintiff in both the Courts is the appellant. The suit has been dismissed by the trial Court and confirmed by the appellate Court. Initially the suit for poisesiion and perpetual injunction was filed and later specific performance of agreement of sale, dated november 28, 1969, Ex. A-l was also sought for. It is his case that the 3rd defendant who is the owner of the property executed an agreement of sale to convey the property for a total consideration of Rs. 5,919-50 and he was put in possession. He being a teacher, he requested the 1st defendant, his father-in-law to look after the lands. But his father-in-law with a view to defraud him, entered into an agreement with the 2nd defendant under Ex. A-6 to alienate the same. For specific performance of that agreement Ex. A6, the 2nd defendant filed the suit O. S. of 1972 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Khammam and the suit has been decreed and possession was taken from the 1st defendant. After coming to know of these events he filed the present suit. The 1st defendant remained parte in the suit and the 3rd defendant filed a written statement contending that she has no titl