SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(AP) 483

P.KODANDA RAMAYYA
P. Narayana Rao, S/o. Narasimha Rao – Appellant
Versus
Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition (General) Hyderguda, near Old M. L. A. quarters, Hyderabad – Respondent


P. KODDANDA RAMAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS batch of writ petitions arise out of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 I of 1894 (hereinafter called the Act) question the Noiificstion issued by the authorities under Section 4 (1) of the said Act on 11-2-1980, published in the Gazette on 28 2-1980 In all the writ petitions the same notification is questioned. The following grounds are urged by the potitioners :1) The substance of the Notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Act was not published in the locality or at any rate simultaneously as laid down by the full Bench of this Court in Yadaiah Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh (1) 1983 (1) ALT 2332) The question is for the cooperative Building Society and Part 7 of the Act is not complied with and the acquisition is void. 3) Sri Mohd Mukarramuddin raised a more formidable question viz after the Land Acquisition (Andhra Pradesh amendment and Validation) Act 9 of 1983 (hereinafter called Amending Act) a declaration under Section 6 of the Act cannot be made dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5-A as contemplated under Section 17 (4) of the Act simultaneously with the publication of the notification under Section 4 (1) but is must be made a














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top