SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(AP) 74

Hindustan Milkfood Manufacturers Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


SEETHARAM REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners, 39 in number, are dealers in milk, mining-materials, butter, gold, silver and so forth. They assail the validity of the amended section 6-A of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") which seeks to impose tax on purchase point, hitherto not exigible on various grounds.

( 2 ) THE petitioners, admittedly dealers, purchase goods such as milk, butter and so forth and then covert into a product like Horlicks and ghee and dispose of the same thereafter. Admittedly the by-product later, on its disposal, is subjected to tax. By Amendment Act No. 49 of 1976 dated 19/08/1976, to be effective from 1/09/1976, the new section 6-A was brought in by which any dealer, who purchases goods either from a registered dealer or from a person other than a registered dealer, will pay tax on the turnover, though the tax hitherto was not payable under section 5 or under section 6 of the Act.

( 3 ) IT is common ground that in all these cases we are solely concerned with the adjudication on questions of law, and therefore, we confine ourselves with the same without dwelling on the factual side of each petition.

( 4 ) THE conten


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top